While I was testing out Chrome and wanted to see what’s the difference between chrome and firefox I came across this article Google Chrome versus Firefox by Percy Cabello. The interesting piece is not in the article itself but in the comments of that article which also took me to a very interesting articles about Chrome’s end-user license agreement. Some argue it infringes the right of the users quoting the following:

“By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services.”

Others claim that part of the EULA hasn’t existed since 4 Sep 08. Google amended it to say:

“You retain copyright and any other rights that you already hold in Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services.”

Check out the following links:

Link 1

Link 2